Methodology

From readiness to measured results

Three connected frameworks take an organisation from "are we ready?" to "is each agent earning its place?", with responsible delegation in between.

The sequence

Diagnose → Quantify → Govern → Measure

AI readiness → value opportunity → responsible delegation → measured financial outcomes.

  1. Stage 1

    Diagnose

    Kiros AI Readiness & Value Index

    Determines organisational capability and the readiness gaps that would stop value being captured.

    Assessed readinessDetails →
  2. Stage 2

    Quantify

    Agent Value Ledger

    Identifies financial value opportunities across revenue, operating costs, capital and risk.

    Estimated opportunityDetails →
  3. Stage 3

    Govern

    AI Delegation Map

    Defines decision authority, human oversight and accountability for each agent.

    Designed controlsDetails →
  4. Stage 4

    Measure

    Financial and operational outcomes

    Tracks verified performance against the agreed baseline, and reports it to the board.

    Realised resultsDetails →
In practice

How the frameworks are used in an engagement

  1. 01
    K-ARVI

    AI readiness

    We score readiness across six dimensions and identify the capability gaps that would stop value being captured.

  2. 02
    Agent Value Ledger

    Value opportunity

    We read the accounts, map value levers and build a case for each candidate agent across revenue, cost, capital and risk.

  3. 03
    AI Delegation Map

    Responsible delegation

    We place each agent's decisions into one of three categories and design the controls each needs.

  4. 04
    Agent Value Ledger

    Measured financial outcomes

    We measure results against the baseline with evidence an auditor would accept, and report to the board.

Separate by design

Readiness is not return

The readiness index measures whether the organisation can capture value. The ledger estimates and then measures the value itself. We keep the two apart, so a high readiness score is never presented as a forecast of financial return.

Our discipline

Rules we hold to

Capacity is not a saving

Freed hours count only when they are redeployed to revenue work or replace hiring that would otherwise happen.

Count the full cost

Model usage, integration, data work, human oversight, validation and assurance all go on the ledger.

No baseline, no agent

If a result cannot be measured before deployment, it cannot be claimed after.

Risk benefits wait for evidence

Lower losses or fewer incidents are counted only once there is enough history to show them.

Roles kept separate

Our advisory work is independent. Where we also lead delivery, or use technology from a company in which we hold an interest, we say so in writing and never assure our own work.

Reading our material

What we publish, and how to read it

We distinguish clearly between research, methodology, experience, portfolio activity, client work and hypothetical illustrations.

Research and publications

Peer-reviewed and academic work by our people. Cited as research, not as client results.

Advisory methodology

Our frameworks: K-ARVI, the Agent Value Ledger and the AI Delegation Map. Proprietary methods, not regulatory standards.

Professional experience

The prior careers and qualifications of our people, described as their experience, not the firm's.

Interests

Where we hold an interest in a company whose technology a client may use, we name it on this site and disclose it in writing.

Client engagements

Our client work is confidential. We do not publish client names or results without permission.

Hypothetical illustrations

Worked examples and scenarios are clearly labelled as hypothetical. They are not case studies.

See the frameworks applied to your business

The Enterprise AI Value Creation Assessment applies all three frameworks in four weeks.

About the assessment